Wednesday, September 26, 2018

Factors Affecting Performance of Concrete During Fire


Factors Affecting Performance of Concrete During Fire



Inevitably, concrete structures are exposed to fire and high temperature during its life service which creates changes in concrete properties detrimentally and also sometimes causing failure.
Therefore, it is considerably significant to understand factors that control concrete performance during fires.
This article would shed light on the factors that govern the performance of concrete during fire.
Factors Affecting Performance of Concrete During Fire
Fig.1: Concrete Element Exposed to Fire

Factors Affecting Performance of Concrete during Fire
Factors that control the performance of concrete during fire include:
  • Water to binding material ratio
  • Moisture content
  • Type of aggregate used to produce concrete
  • Supplementary cementitious materials
  • Fibers

Water to Binding Material Ratio

One of the factors that influence the performance of concrete during fire is the water to binding material ratio. The smaller the ratio of W/B ration the better the performance of concrete subjected to fire.
It is proven that the decrease of compressive strength and modulus of elasticity of concrete with high w/b ratio (0.6) is greater than that of concrete with low w/b ratio (0.28-0.35). This trend is the same for lightweight concrete and concrete made with cement replacement materials such as fly ash and slag.
It should be noticed that concrete with low w/b ratio would suffer spalling at lower temperature compare with concrete with high w/b ratio.
water-binder-ratio-concrete

Moisture Content of Concrete

Moisture content directly affects the performance of concrete during fire. It is shown that the increase of moisture content would increase the possibility of concrete spalling due to high pore vapor pressure.
The level of moisture content is based on the relative humidity and nature of coarse aggregate. If the level of relative humidity is greater than eighty percent, then concrete would suffer spalling when exposed to fire.

Type of Aggregate Used to Produce Concrete

Aggregate occupy about 60-70% of volume of concrete, so aggregate properties considerably influence the performance of concrete during fire.
There are three common types of aggregated used to produce concrete namely carbonate like limestone, siliceous such as granite and sandstone and lightweight aggregates such as expanded clay and ceramsite sand.
Carbonate Aggregate for Concrete
Fig.2: Carbonate Aggregate for Concrete
Sandstone Aggregate
Fig.3: Sandstone Aggregate
Lightweight Aggregate
Fig.4: Lightweight Aggregate
The performance of concrete made from each type of aggregate is different due to properties of these aggregates.
It is demonstrated that, fire and spalling resistance of concrete made from carbonate aggregate is greater than concrete produced using siliceous aggregate. This is because the specific heat of carbonate aggregate is larger than of siliceous aggregate.
The higher the specific aggregate the better the resistance of concrete against spalling due to fire.
Apart from large heat capacity, there are other factors that contribute the enhancement of fire resistance of carbonate aggregate for example durability and ductility.
As far as lightweight aggregate is concern, it is expected to exhibit great performance during fire since thermal conductivity of such aggregate is low and hence its resistance to heat is high.
It is shown based on test that, concrete produced using lightweight or carbonate aggregate exposed to 648.80C would retain compressive strength whereas concrete made from siliceous aggregate would lose half of its compressive strength when exposed to the same degree of temperature.

Supplementary Cementitious Materials

Generally, blending cementitious materials such as blast furnace slag and fly ash improve the performance of concrete subjected to fire. But the influence of cementitious materials is not the same and type of aggregate is also affect concrete performance.
It is demonstrated based on tests that, compressive strength of conventional concrete would be entirely lost at temperature of 1050C whereas concrete produced using cement plus 80% slag replacement would lose around 82% of its compressive strength.
Additionally, supplementary materials would increase the resistance of concrete to spalling during fire. Unlike other supplementary materials, silica fume would outperform by normal concrete when they are exposed to the same degree of fire.
Fly Ash for Fire Resistance of Concrete
Fig.5: Fly Ash for Fire Resistance of Concrete
Silica Fume for Fire Resistance of Concrete
Fig.6: Silica Fume for Fire Resistance of Concrete

Fibers in Concrete

By and large, the addition of fiber would improve the performance of concrete exposed to fire. For example, it is shown that the addition of polypropylene increases the resistance of concrete to spalling.
However, it does not enhance mechanical properties of concrete noticeably. It is recommended to mix 0.1 to 0.5 percent of polypropylene to improve spalling resistance. It is advised to use long fibers if it is anticipated that concrete would be subject to high temperature.
Steel fiber is another type of fiber which can be blended with concrete. Spalling resistance of concrete mixed with steel fiber is inferior to that of concrete blended to polypropylene, but mechanical properties of concrete is generally improved.
So, it can be said that the addition of fibers would enhance the performance of concrete subjected to fire.
polypropylene-fiber-for-concrete
Fig.7: Polypropylene Fiber to Increase Fire Resistance of Concrete

Why Select Reinforced Concrete as Construction Material for a Structure


Why Select Reinforced Concrete as Construction Material for a Structure?



There are various factors that affect the decision to choose reinforced concrete over other construction materials such as masonry, steel and timber. Reinforced concrete has several properties and advantages over other construction materials which makes it favorites for building and other construction.

Why Select Reinforced Concrete as Construction Material for a Structure?

Factors that affect the choice of reinforced concrete over other construction material for building construction include:
  • Economy
  • Suitability of the material for structural and architectural functions
  • Low maintenance
  • Availability of materials
  • Rigidity
  • Fire resistance

Economy of Reinforced Concrete

In most cases, the overall cost of the structure is the first and most important factor that considered. Obviously, the cost of the structure made up of the cost of materials used for the construction, labor cost and time allocated for the construction of the structure.
Comparatively, the thickness of concrete floor is smaller than that of steel structure. This is because floors are flat plates or flat slabs or beams and girder or joists are fitted within the same depth.
Consequently, the overall height of the structure is decreased, which is considerably desired, in comparison with steel floors.
The reduction of the structure height would lead to decrease in wind force of the structure since the exposed area of the building to wind is lesser than that of steel structure.
If the height of the building is decreased, then savings can be made in claddings and electrical and mechanical risers.
There are cases in which the time allocated for the construction of the structure would control the entire cost of the structure. Because contractors need to assign specific budget for the construction, and they will not be able to take their investment back until the building is constructed.
Therefore, it is might be more economical to consider fast construction and receive the investment sooner. This may offset the extra cost used for the formwork and extra material used.
Reinforced concrete materials are broadly available and can be used and casted as per requirements. However, steel elements need to be ordered to be fabricated and should be paid partially in advance to arrange the job at steel fabricating yard.
Any strategy that the designer use to standardize the design and forming will decrease the overall cost. For example, the same formworks can be used for all columns of the structure and using smaller concrete strength at upper storeys will reduce the overall cost of reinforced concrete construction.

Suitability of Reinforced Concrete for Structural and Architectural Functions

It is possible to combine both architectural and structural functions in reinforced concrete system. Fresh concrete can be placed in any forms and shapes and desired textures can be provided through available finishing techniques.
Not only does reinforced concrete structure is capable of serving its main purpose which is supporting loads but also it can provide aesthetically appealing appearances.
The size and shape of reinforced concrete member is controlled by designer.
Reinforced Concrete as Construction Material
Fig.1: Reinforced concrete support loads and provide aesthetically appealing appearances

Low maintenance of Reinforced Concrete Structures

Generally, reinforced concrete structure does not require considerable maintenance compared to steel and timber structures.
This advantageous side of reinforced concrete would be more obvious in the case when dense and air entrained concrete is used for exposed areas and sufficient drainage is provided.
Low maintenance of Reinforced Concrete Structures
Fig.2: Substantially old water tower reinforced concrete structure, still serve its purpose without the need of major maintenance

Availability of Materials for Reinforced Concrete

The constituent of concrete such as sand, gravel and cement are widely available and steel bars are delivered to the construction site easily compared with case of steel element deliveries.
That is why it is recommended to use reinforced concrete for building construction in remote areas.
Availability of Materials for Reinforced Concrete
Fig.3: Reinforced Concrete Materials Available Widely

Rigidity of Structures

Commonly, reinforced concrete structure possesses great rigidity. That is why vibration problem does not frequently occur in reinforced concrete structures.

Fire resistance of Reinforced Concrete

Structures should withstand fire for a period that is enough for the evacuation of the building and prevent the loss of lives and then control the fire. By and large, concrete structures can resist fire for a time ranges from 1 to 3 hours without the need of any special measures to improve building fire resistance.
However, this is not the case for other construction materials such as timber and steel and hence they need to be fire protected to be able to withstand fire for specific time.
This is a strong advantage of reinforced concrete that other construction materials are lacking.
Fire resistance of Reinforced Concrete
Fig.4: Reinforced concrete structure suffered from extreme fire and still stand and has not collapsed

Monday, September 24, 2018

Risk Management in Construction Projects




Risk Management in Construction Projects



Risk management in construction industry is an important part of the project planning and management. Various risks associated with construction projects such as financial risks, environmental risks, socio-economic and construction related risks are studied and dealt in risk management.
The volatility and capriciousness of the environment in the construction industry was never hidden from anyone. It’s easily influenced by external factors (technical, design, logistics, physical, operating, environmental, socio-political, force majeure et cetera) which are capable of not only derailing projects but can also create an irreparable aberration.
Risk management, therefore, becomes a pivotal instrument that helps us deal with the culling out of various risks, their analyses, and the remedial steps that could be taken to avert them in a particular project.

Risk Management in Construction Projects
Construction Project Planning and Management



Types of Risks in Construction Project Management

The major risks that usually crop up in front of a project manager while helming a construction project are: financial, socio-political, environmental, and construction related.

1. Financial risks

Vacillating exchange rates, material costs, market demand, improper estimation, inflation, payment delays, unmanaged cash flow and financial incompetence of the contractor pose a huge threat of financial risks in a project.

2. Socio-Political risks

Amendments in governmental laws and regulations, law and order, bribery, payment failure by the government, increase in taxes and change in government form this repertoire.

3. Environmental risks

Inclement weather conditions, natural disasters, accessibility to the site, pollution and safety norms constitute the environmental risks.

4. Construction-related risks

Failure of logistics, labor disputes, design changes, labor productivity, rush bidding, time-gap for revision of drawings, shoddy work quality due to time constraints et cetera comprise the construction-related risks.

Risk Management Process in Construction Project

Risk management process is nothing but a series of steps that help identify and migrate the risks for the successful closure of a project. If done correctly and sincerely, construction risk management will reduce not only the likelihood of an event occurring, but also the magnitude of its impact.
In the simplest terms, Risk management process is taking preemptive actions to avoid and minimize any kind of jeopardy to a project in future.
This is how a typical Risk management planning progresses

Risk Management Process in Construction Project
Risk Management Process in Construction

1. Risk Identification


Risk Identification in Construction Project
Five basic ways through which risk identification is done

Brainstorming

All the relevant people associated with the project convene and discuss all the aspects of the project comprehensively and raise their ideas and thoughts foreseeing the risks in their perceptions. There is a facilitator who notes it all down and differentiates between the imperative and unnecessary ones.

Delphi technique

Questionnaires are answered in anonymity by a group of expert panelists in rounds followed with an aim of converging towards one mutual answer by improved judgement after consecutive rounds. The process is stopped after a predefined stop criterion (no. of rounds, stability).

Interview/Expert Opinion

Experienced personnel and relevant people are consulted for their opinions and advice to avoid factors affecting risk.

Past Experience

Similar projects are brought up and perused rigorously to identify the factors that could affect the project.

Checklists

A predetermined list of all the risks that could pose a threat to the project are delved, drawn and juxtaposed from the previously completed projects with analogous criterion.

2. Risk Assessment / Analysis

After all the probable risks have been identified, their valuation is done based on qualitative and quantitative methods. With risk assessment method, available information is used to extricate the frequency of occurrence and the level of consequences in risk management.

Qualitative method

It is usually used for small and medium-scaled projects and involves listing and collating the risks and prioritizing and deprioritizing them as per the opinions of relevant people. The risks are also rated as high, medium or low depending on the collected opinions and risk tolerance boundaries in the organization. Qualitative method is also used when there is not enough data available or when there is some stiff time constraint attached to the project.

Quantitative method

Quantitative methods have to do with analyzing the effect of risks with crunching data and numbers and is used for large projects. Some major Quantitative assessment methods are: Decision tree analysis, expected monetary value, expert judgement, fault tree analysis, fuzzy logic, probability distribution, sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo estimations etc. Quantitative analysis requires a greater effort as it demands oodles of data for getting a precise and accurate analysis.

3. Risk Response

After identification and assessment of the risks are done, available options to avert the risks are marked and discussed in case they ever crop up in future. Besides opting the apt remedial measures for risks affecting the project, positive opportunities too are gleaned from the risks.
Risk response is further subcategorized into Risk avoidance, Risk transfer, risk mitigation and risk acceptance depending upon the nature of the risks.

Risk avoidance

Shunning away from the tasks that involve risks is risk avoidance. Though it’s not always possible to avoid the risks this way, it is the simplest way to tackle the risks.
In easier terms, steering clearing of the parts of the project that may introduce new risks that may endanger the whole project is risk avoidance.
Risk avoidance is most likely to take place where the level of risk is at a level where the project is potentially feasible.

Risk transfer

There are various ways through which one can transfer risks from their projects to the third parties. Purchasing insurance, outsourcing intricate and sophisticated work to an experienced organization, using a fixed price contract instead of unit price contract and the complete removal of warranty and guarantee terms.

Risk mitigation

Reducing the impact of the risks that are inevitable and nontransferable in a project is termed as risk mitigation or risk reduction. Reviewing your project anew, alleviating complexities in procedure, providing additional testing et cetera are some ways through which one can mitigate risks.

Risk acceptance

Every project carries risk in some form. Some risks have to be hauled and made a part of the project with the consensus of all the relevant parties associated with the project. Keeping cost and time factor in view, management authorities must be informed regarding the consequence in case the risk occurs.

4. Risk monitoring and control

To keep a rigorous check on the implementation of Risk identification, Risk assessment and Risk response risk monitoring and control is essential. Along with ensuring the execution of risk plans, it monitors the trigger conditions for contingencies and the probabilities of new impending risks during project execution.
Team meetings and every singly checklist created during the initial stage get pored over by the monitoring authority and corrective actions are taken as per the requirement. Monitoring and control is done throughout the life of the project.